Is that supposed to be advantageous? If I want to run a lot of tests, then
yea. Otherwise I need to take care while naming my tests
Wendy Smoak-3 wrote:
>
> On 9/23/07, zalym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> It works without the package name right? When I give the test with the
>> package name, it exits with a no tests to run message, where as when I
>> try
>> without the packagename, then it works.
>
> Correct. It uses a pattern like **/*${test} so you don't need the
> package name/directory path.
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Running-a-single-JUnit-test-tf4179089s177.html#a12851587
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
