"Eric Redmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/21/2007 12:12:55 PM:

> On 8/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I have a question that I hope isn't too basic. I've been trying to
> > reconcile the behavior of dependency management with my expectations. 
I'll
> > state in advance that I'm more than willing to admit that my 
expectations
> > might be unrealistic.
> >
> > We've got a "home grown" dependency mechanism that works as follows: 
If
> > artifact A requires artifact B and artifact B does not exist it builds
> > artifact B before building artifact A.
> 
> 
> That isn't really a dependency mechanism in Maven - that is a module
> hierarchy. As long as module B exists in the set of modules along with 
A,
> and A depends on B, then B will be built first.

Essentially, yes. If the reactor allowed it I would use module 
hierarchies.

> 
> To further clarify what I'd like to do, I had originally started with 
the
> > <modules> element but quickly ran into this screnario: artifacts A and 
B
> > are built in the same POM (<packaging>pom</packaging>), and both 
require
> > artifact C. This does not make it past the reactor engine, which will 
not
> > allow artifact C to appear more than once.
> 
> 
> True - why would you want the same artifact built more than once?
> 

You wouldn't. Our home grown system remembers that you've already visited 
the module during this phase and skips it for visits 2 through N.

> Is this behavior possible with the <dependencyManagement> tags? So far 
it
> > doesn't seem likely, but perhaps I'm not understanding dependency
> > management, which brings us back to that start of this message.
> 
> 
> I'm not understanding what you want to do. Is what behavior possible? 
Making
> the reactor build a project twice? If that is your question, then no.
> 

Thanks for the explanation. I didn't think dependency management was the 
answer either. I'll have to port our home grown system to a plugin at some 
point, or convince management to re-engineer the build process.


Thanks again,
Robert Egan


This email message and any attachments may contain confidential, 
proprietary or non-public information.  The information is intended solely 
for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or transmission error 
has misdirected this email, please notify the sender immediately and 
destroy this email.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this 
information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the author personally.

Reply via email to