Hi Wayne,

I have the tests working in eclipse, but not in maven.
And even then eclipse and maven need to work together because of some
problems in project building with eclipse.

As I've stated before for some reason my maven build fails with testng
because surefire and testng and the embedded container do not work well
together.

in the log I see that jboss finds the sessionbeans I've created. but when I
do a lookup the only thing I am able to retrieve is the user transaction.
every other object (entitymanagerfactory, sessionbeans) could not be
retrieved from jndi

any clue?
Rolf

On 4/2/07, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Rolf, just wondering how far along you got in converting the
CaveatEmptor JPA/EJB3/Hibernate app from Ant to Maven... I've been
working on this myself some this morning.

Were you ever 100% successful? Assuming you were, we should send your
modified zip to Hibernate for inclusion on their download page.

Also, why is the JBoss stuff only available on the Andromda repo? I'd
hope JBoss would host it, or perhaps even Central.

Wayne

On 4/2/07, Thorsten Heit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
>
> > this is not a junit test but a testng.
> > Transactions are handled in the testmethods themselves.
> > The error messages are not describing the real error.
> > The problem is that for some reason during the maven execution of the
> > test.
> > Testng and the embeddable ejb container  have some conflicts but  I
don't
> > see why
> > I  know this only by looking at the first  error  and  having
commented
> > out
> > a line in the second test (transaction.begin) than the second test
fails
> > by
> > stating that a session bean was not bound/found.
>
> Sorry, but I don't know TestNG, only JUnit... According to the exception
I'd assume that there _is_ a problem with correctly opening and closing the
transaction. If not, then at least with the initialization and/or shutdown
of your test class / test method...
>
> Without knowing your source I'm wondering whether your failing test
class can run standalone or relies on others for doing its checks, for
example via static initializers, during init/shutdown etc. Have you checked
that?
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Thorsten
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to