very good point, yes - it raises 2 questions
1) Do we need to start pushing the continuum heirarchy build idea
faster? (trygvis, kenny and I had a brief talk about this yesterday)
2) should ${project.version} for SNAPSHOT perhaps insert SNAPSHOT rather
than the dated stamp, perhaps providing ${project.snapshotversion} for
the origional system?
Thoughts anyone?
Andy
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 21:41 +0930, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> > of course in your parent pom.xml you can happily use ${project.version}
> > to specify the dependencies on child modules which saves you worrying
> > about that part :)
>
> I had problems with using ${project.version} as when the artifacts are
> deployed to a snapshot repository the pom metadata is using the
> resolved timestamped snapshot version and not just the latest snapshot
> available.
>
> I have continuum re-building the system hourly and since the parent
> pom and modules are built individually by continuum I had to change
> from ${project.version} in the parent pom dependency management
> section to -SNAPSHOT and all started working as I expected.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
