On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 09:58 -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> I noticed that the Maven Wagon JARs that are depended upon by such
> things as the artifact plugin belong to the groupId
> org.apache.maven.wagon. Is this the new standard for naming groupIds?
> What was the rationale for changing this, and are other Apache projects
> doing the same?

As far as I can remember that has been the group id since we started
building Wagon and SCM with Maven 2. The new more verbose naming
convention was needed to make it easier to organize the artifacts (and
as a side-effect it gives Ibiblio some help in that the index page won't
list nearly as much directories :)

Hopefully most people and projects (include the Apache ones) will see
the benefits of this new layout and start using it. I've already seen
quite a few projects that's using the new naming convention [1,2]

[1]: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/
[1]: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/net/

--
Trygve



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to