On 9/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I would say that the packaging for an Ear should be more complex > concerning the dependencies declared in its pom: > - for a Jar or an Ejb, then I agree that the transitive dependencies must > be included in the Ear > - for a War, the default behaviour should be to include only the War > itself, without all its transitive dependencies. There could be a property > 'included' to tell the packager to take a specific dependency of the War > and put it up in the Ear. (this would be the opposite behaviour as > currently with the 'excluded' property) > > What do you guys think of this? Is this relevant? If so, is this feasible?
This is equivalent to: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-818 - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
