On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:15 +1000, Washusen, Dan wrote: > I'd stick with Maven 1.1 if you want to use ant tasks as it includes a > more recent version of ant.
Makes sense... > Out of interest, why are you using the ant junit report instead of maven > junit report plugin > <http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/junit-report/goals.html>? > Currently, we are. However, the "unified" JUnit report seems to make little distinction if there are test names that are identical (in two different test classes). If one defines a couple of large test suites, each running the _same_ tests with a different configuration set, then the report seems to conflate the test names in such a way that it is difficult to discern the class in which a particular result was found. The ant JUnit report uses the class name as a namespace, and it's a bit easier to navigate, IMO. (but that's just a matter of style) I have a feeling that I'm just missing something in my poor command of maven scripting... -- Matt Meola Contractor Vericept Corporation 555 17th Street, Suite 1500 Denver, Colorado 80202 "Protecting Your Information and Reputation tm" tel: (303) 798-1568 ext. 5009 fax: (303) 268-0520 http://www.vericept.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
