Am 2021-10-23 um 21:24 schrieb Václav Haisman:
On 23. 10. 21 20:37, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-10-17 um 11:56 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Hi Users,
are there any Maven users who use Maven SCM Hg provider directly or
indirectly through Maven Release Plugin?
We are currently reviewing the vast amount of code in Maven SCM and
try to reduce what cannot reasonable maintain.
Please raise your voice and tell us about your usecase and the
Mercurial version you use.
Compared to Git or Subversion:
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.0:test (default-test) @
maven-scm-provider-hg ---
[INFO]
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Running org.apache.maven.scm.provider.hg.HgUtilsTest
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.06 s - in org.apache.maven.scm.provider.hg.HgUtilsTest
[INFO] Running
org.apache.maven.scm.provider.hg.repository.HgScmProviderRepositoryTest
[INFO] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.002 s - in
org.apache.maven.scm.provider.hg.repository.HgScmProviderRepositoryTest
[INFO]
[INFO] Results:
[INFO]
[INFO] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
This is virtually no testing at all. As far as I can see this is best
effort, if any effort at all. TCKs for Git and Subversion are massive.
I have not had any issues with it via the Maven Release plugin so far.
I don't doubt that, but having so little tests gives me a bit of a bad
aftertaste. Maybe I am too overcautious.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
