Cool, I'll create a minimal reproduction.
Niels On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 11:35 AM Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, > > could you create a simple resproducer for this? As for me, it is unclear: > - what "my library module" is > - what is "integration-tests-logging-java-no-log4j" is (is it same as > above? from name, seems not) > - if the two not same, are the integration test having same dependences as > "library" (I mean, in one log4j is present in other is not) > - I think these are two distinct modules but you mention "same test" > passing and failing? > > IMO, a reproducer would immediately explain the issue (and may be base for > a possible IT as well)... > > Thanks in advance > T > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 11:30 AM Niels Basjes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have written a java library that I want to be fully working for various > > situations. > > > > The thing I'm having trouble with is testing my error handling in case of > > missing dependencies that are expected to be "provided". > > Some of these dependencies are only called in edge cases in the > processing. > > Thus I have a forced check at the startup to verify everything is > correct. > > > > I have created several maven modules in my project dedicated to those > kinds > > of tests. > > > > I found however that in some cases it makes a difference running the "mvn > > test" in those modules when running them from the root of the project or > > when running it only in the specific testing module. > > > > Specific example: > > I have log4j-core as a provided dependency in my "library" module and > when > > I run the "full project" build my error handling test fails as the > testing > > module will "have" the log4j-core dependency (where I want to test the > > scenario it doesn't have it). > > So my build fails. > > > > I then continue the build with mvn package -rf > > :integration-tests-logging-java-no-log4j > > then the test does pass (i.e. the missing dependency is properly missing > > and the error handling works as expected). > > > > What is the correct way to resolve this effect? > > > > -- > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, > > > > Niels Basjes > > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, Niels Basjes
