On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Curtis Rueden <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Benson, > >> I did not know how to tell them how to write a range that has the >> desired effect. Is there one? > > Would it work to use a hacky range like: > [1.0.0,1.9999.9999]
That is my fallback advice to them, indeed. The no '.0.0' release advise will be a bitter pill to swallow. > ? > > Regards, > Curtis > > -- > Curtis Rueden > LOCI software architect - http://loci.wisc.edu/software > ImageJ2 lead, Fiji maintainer - http://imagej.net/User:Rueden > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Our rule of thumb at $work is NEVER, EVER, E V E R release a .0 artefact >> for this exact reason. >> >> Always start with .1 >> >> Mark >> >> -- >> Mark Derricutt >> http://www.theoryinpractice.net >> http://www.chaliceofblood.net >> http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt >> http://twitter.com/talios >> http://facebook.com/mderricutt >> >> On 13 Jan 2017, at 11:22, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> > I did not know how to tell them how to write a range that has the >> > desired effect. Is there one? >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
