Sounds like a good idea for the site.. manfred
offbynull-maven wrote on 19.03.2015 22:03: > I understand that. But, shouldn't this be explicitly stated somewhere? > Some official guide somewhere essentially saying that if you're planning > on releasing your mojo publicly... > > to support Maven2 you should be using JDK1.5 or lower (don't actually > know if this is correct) > to support Maven3.0 to 3.2 you should be using JDK1.6 or lower > to support Maven3.3+ you should be using JDK1.7 or lower > > On 3/19/2015 9:47 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: >> How else will it work? >> If you compile it into Java 8 byte-code, the Java 6 run-time is going >> to have a tough time running it. >> >> Ron >> On 20/03/2015 12:31 AM, offbynull-maven wrote: >>> If the minimum JDK for Maven3 is JDK1.6, should my custom mojo always >>> be built against JDK1.6 or lower? >>> >>> Are there any guidelines around this? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
