6 jan 2014 kl. 14:10 skrev Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>: >> >> The arguments about quality I just don't buy. We are only talking poms >> here. Whatever is in the poms says nothing about the quality of the >> software itself. > > > Quality of metadata. POM serve as "metadata" in this case, so, I'd rather > say Central enforces quality of "metadata" (ie. POM properly "filled in", > using proper and proven/owned groupId, sane artifactId, etc, minimal set of > fields are given, file signatures, checksums are present, no update of > already deployed stuff happens [ie. your deploy request would overwrite > something in Cenral] etc). > > Still, you can deploy a jar full of zeroes to Central if you wish, all > until you use proper GA, the checksums and signatures matches, and POM > fulfills minimal requirements :)
And I think that is a good thing! It would be rather stupid to do that, but that is beside the point :-). > > > My 5 cents --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
