looks like it is bug from maven itself since the merge code is from there

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Jim McCaskey
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually, I don't think the merge is doing the right thing, at least not for 
> SNAPSHOT's.  If you look at the example maven-metadata.xml file below, it 
> fills in the <versioning> section properly.  But the part where it actually 
> lists the snapshot versions under <snapshotVersions> is not getting updated.
>
> I'm making use of my repository managers Rebuild Metadata function to get the 
> maven-metadata.xml files updated properly.
>
> IMHO, someone who knows more about those maven-metadata.xml files would need 
> to tell you what is the "right" thing to have in there. As far as I know that 
> file under the version directory should just list the latest SNAPSHOT version 
> to use.
>
> -Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Tran [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:43 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: merge-maven-repos problems with maven-metadata.xml
>
> So far what I hear is the merge is doing the right thing, however, we
> still need to reindexing repo manager to pickup metadata changes.
>
> if not so,  we need more details about how exactly metadata must be
> after the merge without the need to run the reindex
>
> -D
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Jim McCaskey
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Your probably right Dan.  I did take a quick walk through the code and it 
>> looked like the wagon-maven-plugin just calls a .merge on the 
>> maven-metadata.xml files from some other package.  I felt there be dragons, 
>> so came up with another "solution".
>>
>> Thanks to Alejandro for the idea of just triggering something on the server. 
>>  I wanted to be a bit more tactical though.  I was able to rebuild just the 
>> Metadata (which is all my builds need to keep going during the day) by doing 
>> this:
>>
>> curl --user <uid>:<pwd> -X DELETE --insecure 
>> https://repoUrl/nexus/service/local/metadata/repositories/repoName/content/path/to/artifact
>>
>> That takes seconds to accomplish instead of a few minutes as that was 
>> tripping up my Jenkins server.  It does put and extra burden on me to 
>> correctly identify which artifacts need to be rebuilt, but I figure a little 
>> scripting can accomplish that. We rebuild the indexes every night, which is 
>> "good enough" for what we need.  I basically followed the REST documentation 
>> on my server.  I found the docs here as well:
>>
>> http://nexus.xwiki.org/nexus/nexus-core-documentation-plugin/core/docs/rest.metadata.domain.target.content.html
>>
>> I'm back in business for now.  Thanks everyone!
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Tran [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
>> To: Maven Users List
>> Subject: Re: merge-maven-repos problems with maven-metadata.xml
>>
>> You may want to talk a look at metadata merge logic under
>> wagon-maven-plugin and fix it, i think it is doable
>>
>> -D
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> i do something similar to fix a bug in nexus (
>>> https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-5525)
>>>
>>> since it is a jenkins build, i just trigger a scheduled (manual) task to
>>> reindex the repo on build finish.
>>> The command i use to trigger it is
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/wget --user=something --password=my-pass
>>> http://url/to/repo/nexus/service/local/schedule_run/21
>>>
>>> where 21 is the id of the reindex job
>>>
>>> So in summary:
>>>
>>> -create scheduled job to "repair repositories index"
>>> -somehow (jenkins in my case) trigger a command to invoke the REST service
>>> -enjoy
>>>
>>> I did not find a REST service directly to trigger a reindex, thus the hack
>>> with the scheduled job. Let me know if you find something better
>>>
>>> hope it helps,
>>>
>>> Alejandro
>>>
>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Jim McCaskey ---2013-03-14
>>> 14:38:57---It's not a Maven build. It's an old legacy non-java (mostly) 
>>> b]Jim
>>> McCaskey ---2013-03-14 14:38:57---It's not a Maven build.  It's an old
>>> legacy non-java (mostly) build that takes 1.5 hours to build, b
>>>
>>> From: Jim McCaskey <[email protected]>
>>> To: Maven Users List <[email protected]>,
>>> Date: 2013-03-14 14:38
>>> Subject: RE: merge-maven-repos problems with maven-metadata.xml
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not a Maven build.  It's an old legacy non-java (mostly) build that
>>> takes 1.5 hours to build, but we still want to crank that whole thing when
>>> there is a change.  I don't publish the build till it is all done.  I use a
>>> stub pom.xml to generate the staging-repo with a bunch of deploy executions
>>> (which I will never show anyone in the Maven community for fear of being
>>> forever banned).  Once that whole things works, then I merge that build
>>> into our SNAPSHOT repo.  Works great except for the maven-metadata.xml
>>> files.
>>>
>>> I think this is the point where folks start telling me I'm doing it wrong.
>>> :)  Honestly, we do our pure Maven stuff "right", it's just this clunker
>>> that we have to hack around a little.
>>>
>>> Our non-SNAPSHOT builds work fine, I just did not know SNAPSHOT's where
>>> treated different, so now I'll have to come up with a workaround to get the
>>> maven-metadata.xml files rigged properly.  You can do that through the
>>> Nexus UI by clicking on the "Rebuild Metadata" button.  Given that the
>>> Nexus folks make a big deal about everything being available through REST,
>>> there's got to be some way to do that programmatically.  Anyone got a hint?
>>> (I know, go ask on the Nexus list)
>>>
>>> -Jim
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dan Tran [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:10 AM
>>> To: Maven Users List
>>> Subject: Re: merge-maven-repos problems with maven-metadata.xml
>>>
>>> You need to reindex for both cases any way since the repository is not
>>> aware of your changes.  Without reindexing, it may not serve your new
>>> artifact.
>>>
>>> Just curious, why do you want to merge snaphot repo, why not just push
>>> the artifact directly to your snapshot repos?
>>>
>>> -D
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Jim McCaskey
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Ouch... Is that documented somewhere?  I checked the bug tracker and
>>> uncle Google and couldn't find anything regarding that.  I went ahead and
>>> opened an issue in Jira:
>>> >
>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1913
>>> >
>>> > I wonder what would be quicker.  Finding a hack around or fixing the
>>> module. :) It would probably be easy to fire off a Nexus reindex of the
>>> effected artifacts which would "fix" the problem for me.
>>> >
>>> > -Jim
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Dan Tran [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:06 AM
>>> > To: Maven Users List
>>> > Subject: Re: merge-maven-repos problems with maven-metadata.xml
>>> >
>>> > merge-maven-repos mojo works with release repos ONLY.  Merging
>>> > snapshot repos requires enhancement
>>> >
>>> > -Dan
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jim McCaskey
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> Hello all,
>>> >>
>>> >> Below you will find a maven-metadata.xml file from my Nexus repository
>>> (GAV changed to protect the innocent).  What you will notice is that the
>>> <snapshot> timestamp and the <snapshotVersions> do not match. I don't think
>>> that it's a Nexus repo issue.   Perhaps a bug in merge-maven-repos.
>>> >>
>>> >> I build the components to an empty directory using the
>>> altDeploymentRepository property:
>>> >>
>>> >> -DaltDeploymentRepository=repo::default::
>>> file://E:\builddir\staging-repo deploy
>>> >>
>>> >> I then publish this component to Nexus using this (using Maven 3.0.4):
>>> >>
>>> >> org.codehaus.mojo:wagon-maven-plugin:1.0-beta-4:merge-maven-repos
>>> >>
>>> >> This seems to work just fine for my non-SNAPSHOT builds.  But the CI
>>> builds seem to get their maven-metadata.xml file messed up every time those
>>> SNAPSHOT builds run.  This took a while to track down because I run "Update
>>> Repositories Index" every night and Nexus fixes the maven-metadata.xml.
>>>  And this is a very long build.
>>> >>
>>> >> FWIW, this is a shim between legacy code and our newer, all Maven build
>>> code.  As you can tell we just zip that mess up and use it whole sale in
>>> downstream builds.
>>> >>
>>> >> Any thoughts on how I can fix this?  Perhaps it's just a bug in
>>> wagon:merge-maven-repos?
>>> >>
>>> >> -Jim
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>> >> <metadata modelVersion="1.1.0">
>>> >>   <groupId>myGroup</groupId>
>>> >>   <artifactId>MyArtifact</artifactId>
>>> >>   <version>10.2.6-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> >>   <versioning>
>>> >>     <snapshot>
>>> >>       <timestamp>20130313.165705</timestamp>
>>> >>       <buildNumber>1</buildNumber>
>>> >>     </snapshot>
>>> >>     <lastUpdated>20130313165705</lastUpdated>
>>> >>     <snapshotVersions>
>>> >>       <snapshotVersion>
>>> >>         <classifier>MyClassifier</classifier>
>>> >>         <extension>zip</extension>
>>> >>         <value>10.2.6-20130311.175410-1</value>
>>> >>         <updated>20130311175410</updated>
>>> >>       </snapshotVersion>
>>> >>       <snapshotVersion>
>>> >>         <extension>pom</extension>
>>> >>         <value>10.2.6-20130311.175410-1</value>
>>> >>         <updated>20130311175410</updated>
>>> >>       </snapshotVersion>
>>> >>     </snapshotVersions>
>>> >>   </versioning>
>>> >> </metadata>
>>> >>
>>> >> NOTICE: All information in and attached to this email may be
>>> proprietary, confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper
>>> or erroneous disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient,
>>> you are not authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
>>> disseminate this message.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > NOTICE: All information in and attached to this email may be
>>> proprietary, confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper
>>> or erroneous disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient,
>>> you are not authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
>>> disseminate this message.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>> NOTICE: All information in and attached to this email may be proprietary,
>>> confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
>>> disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
>>> authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or disseminate
>>> this message.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>> DISCLAIMER: Privileged and/or Confidential information may be contained in
>>> this message. If you are not the addressee of this message, you may not
>>> copy, use or deliver this message to anyone. In such event, you should
>>> destroy the message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. It is
>>> understood that opinions or conclusions that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the company are neither given nor endorsed by the company.
>>> Thank You.
>>>
>>>
>> NOTICE: All information in and attached to this email may be proprietary, 
>> confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous 
>> disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not 
>> authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or disseminate 
>> this message.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> NOTICE: All information in and attached to this email may be proprietary, 
> confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous 
> disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not 
> authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or disseminate 
> this message.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to