On 13.03.2013 16:58, Wayne Fay wrote:
The strange setup is only due to my effort to reduce the example code to the minimum. I wanted to provide working POMs that all the scenarios I'm describing can be reproduced with.<dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>maven.issue</groupId> <artifactId>dependency</artifactId> <version>1.0</version>...<modules> <module>dependency</module> </modules>This seems like a bad idea right up front. You shouldn't have a dependency as a module in the same pom. You have constructed essentially a circular reference.
Cheers, Wolf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
