it all depends on whether olamy decides as RM to backport or not. he is RM for the 3.0.4 release by virtue of action.
On Tuesday, 3 January 2012, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote: > Surely something as egregious as allowing releases to break should block > 3.0.4 from being released tho. As someone who uses GPG in that manner for > some of his releases I'd certainly want 3.0.4 to be able to release... > > -- > "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, > Porcupine Tree > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Stephen Connolly < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I have checked in a fix towards 3.0.5... >> >> Pester olamy to backport... >> >> though he may want to wait for me to write the tests of the fix >> (manual testing confirms the fix... just have to figure out how to get >> automated testing!) >> >> On 3 January 2012 16:03, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Is this still broken under the 3.0.4-RC4 builds, or just 3.0.3? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven >> Wilson, >> > Porcupine Tree >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Connolly < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I just found a regression: >> >> >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5224 >> >> >> >> I think it is serious enough to recommend users avoid using the above >> >> combination if you rely on properties in a settings.xml profile to GPG >> >> sign your releases. (i.e. anyone pushing to Central) >> >> >> >> -Stephen >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
