As a heavy user of site, your view that maven '3' isn't real yet is entirely understandable.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Maven User <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, maybe I'm misunderstanding - but initially, I thought the goal of maven3 > was that it should have been a direct replacement with backward > compatibility. > > For companies who rely heavily on site generation/deployment, this truly > isn't the case. > > There are a lot of flaming hoops to jump through for this kind of thing. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
