Note : a hack has been added in last release 2.2 for this use case. HTH, -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-457 2011/7/5 Mark Derricutt <[email protected]>: > Regardless of your choice between git or mercurial ( I vote git btw ) be > aware that due to git/mercurials tagging model, and how maven-release-plugin > works, maven works better with an artifact per repository model. > > So instead of having 3-4 artifacts in a single repo you'll need to split > them up ( unless you want a single version number for all things ). > > After we switched from subversion to git I wrote up a short post on what I > did: > > http://theoryinpractise.tumblr.com/post/1350252794/repository-migration-from-subversion-to-git > > Hope it helps. > > PS: git git git git git git git ;-) > > -- > "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, > Porcupine Tree > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Peter Horlock <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> We are planning to move from SVN to either GIT or Mercurial. >> What would you recommend using? >> Which has the better Maven / Eclipse / Sonar Support? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
