Cool, thanks! I might just look into that. Phillip
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Leonard Ehrenfried < [email protected]> wrote: > We tried to change the version *range* resolution strategy once at my old > company. We found that this component is not injected by the DI container > but rather instantiated with 'new'. > > A colleague of mine wrote a patch and opened a ticket [1] that does exactly > that. We didn't end up using the patch ourselves but maybe it can give you > a > clue where you need to be looking. > > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5017 > > Lenni > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No, it doesn't. At least not out-of-the-box. I don't know if it would be > > possible to extend in any way to get this behavior. > > > > /Anders > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 06:08, Phillip Hellewell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Does Maven 3.x support any strategies other than "nearest definition" > for > > > transitive dependency mediation? > > > > > > Specifically I am interested in if it has the ability to use the > "highest > > > version #" found anywhere in the dependency tree. > > > > > > Phillip > > > > > >
