Hi Anders,

Thanks for your clarifications. I try get the wordings right. But what
are you actually suggesting? I mean stay away from profiles. Yeah. But
what to use instead? Modules will not work as I am actually already
using them. I need modules that have an aggregation parent and still get
some model type specific configuration (plugins e.g. that are always
same for a certain module type).

Currently using profiles and <activation><file><exists> is only a
workaround. I am still curious to get a reply from some Maven
contributor on whether this problem can be solved with MIXIN and when
MIXIN will be available.

Using profiles in this manner has the advantage that all module pom
files are using the traditional aggregation parent but do not contain
any redundant plugin configurations that are related to the module type
(e.g. modeling project, java implementation project, web service project
and so on)

/Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of ext Anders Hammar
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:09 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Expected implementation date for Maven MIXIN Feature

Please, don't call it a super-pom. There is only one (and will only be
just
one) super-POM and it lives in Maven core. What you are talking about is
a
parent-pom and should be called that.

Also, you're talking about archetypes which is something completely
different from "artifacts" which I believe you're referring to. Please
pay
attention to the wording as it makes it easier for other people to
understand what you're explaining.

As you've noticed, the actual profile isn't inherited but rather the
effect
of the profile. One of those tricky things with profiles but that's by
design. The simplest thing is to try staying away from profiles all
together
as they very often trick you into doing something which isn't the Maven
Way..

/Anders

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 20:32, Bock, Richard (NSN - DE/Munich) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Today I found a workaround which is somehow not optional but keeps me
> alive.
>
> All the base artifact types of a certain platform type will be put
into a
> super-pom for that platform type. E.g. jee-super-pom. Each artifact
base
> type plugin and properties is encapsulated into a Profile. The profile
is
> activated by a file that exists in the child project.
>
> Now the aggregator project myapp-pom can inherit from the
jee-super.pom.
>
> Each module module-pom will have a file e.g. javalib-architype,
> groovylib-architype, basemodel-architype, testimpl-architype. This
will
> activate the base architype profiles.
>
> Drawback is that this leaves the module-pom projects with funny empty
> marker files in the project folder and the files cannot be looked up
in the
> repository as they are no architypes.
>
> What I find rather annoying is that even the activiation condition
based on
> properties will not work as the parent profiles will only be triggered
by
> parent properties and not by properties defined in the module-pom.
>
> So I just hope someday or earlier then later someone will add a
feature to
> Maven to resolved the parent properties, then the child properties and
then
> start resolving the profiles only.
>
> Or let us keep the hope up some one delivers the MIXIN feature.
>
> /Richard
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Wayne Fay [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:19 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Expected implementation date for Maven MIXIN Feature
>
> > AM gets the version from A through the parent relationship.
> > AM gets the plugin sce.model from the MIXIN relationship to M.
> >
> > AI gets the version from A through the parent relationship.
> > AI gets the plugin sce.compile from the MIXIN relationship to I.
>
> Sounds roughly like composition of objects/projects in the POM, is
> that about right? I haven't really been following any discussion of
> Mixins previously.
>
> Wayne
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to