+1. Maven 3 includes improvements about parent pom handling. See http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Iron+Fist+of+Maven+3.0+transition+pack#IronFistofMaven3.0transitionpack-relativepathtoparent
I suspect you're referring to a pom that's just not in the parent directory. In maven 2, this is not a warning, in maven 3, you just have to put an empty <relativePath /> in your <parent /> tag. Cheers 2010/8/24 Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > If you set the relativePath element for the parent section, does it make a > difference? > > /Anders > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 18:03, EJ Ciramella <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hello again list - was hoping to NOT be sending all these maven 3 > > questions...but..... > > > > So we have a parental pom that listed as the top module in the top level > > pom. > > > > In maven 2, the build just chugs along successfully and handles this no > > problem. > > > > In maven 3, however, somehow maven jumps right by this particular module > > and then errors out saying there are version strings missing in some > > dependencies (because we're using dependency management tags and have the > > versions defined there). If I install the parent pom by hand, THEN run > the > > build from the top down, there are no issues. > > > > My past experience with "corporate" poms was that they weren't normally > in > > the standard branching structure and typically deployed to the repo > manager > > by hand, which isn't the case here (yet). > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > P.S. - I'm really enjoying how maven 3 is making us honest with how we > have > > some stuff set up! > > > > > > ________________________________ > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and the information transmitted > within > > including any attachments is only for the recipient(s) to which it is > > intended and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any > > review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of; or taking of any > > action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other > than > > the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, > please > > send the e-mail back by replying to the sender and permanently delete the > > entire message and its attachments from all computers and network systems > > involved in its receipt. > > > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
