On 6/30/10 8:42 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > is : valid within a urn? Yes.
> > On 30 June 2010 13:34, lukewpatterson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Stan Devitt-2 wrote: >>> >>> Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used >> by >>> the dependency plugin? >>> (e.g. junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test ) >>> >> >> I was looking more for a URN for Maven coordinates, which is slightly >> different than the flattened form of <dependency> elements. e.g. the >> <scope> portion isn't part of what I'm looking for, it is more a statement >> of how I rely upon it >> >> >> Brian Fox-3 wrote: >>> >>> Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common >>> >> >> I'm trying to wrap my mind around the differences and pros/cons of that vs. >> a format listed in the Maven docs[1] >> >> groupId:artifactId:packaging:classifier:version >> >> The format Brian listed seems to work better when some portions are >> optional. >> >> so maybe urn:maven:groupId:artifactId:version:classifier:extension ? >> >> [1] http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p512112.html >> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
