Actually switching to emma got things working.. I just start jetty from the base class of my selenium test. I have a static field that prevents jetty from attempting to start twice.
Seems to work great. D/ On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:23 PM, hanasaki wrote: > most of what I have found points to using emma to get code coverage in > the integration phase using the failsafe plugin and embedded Jetty. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: cobertura & jetty > From: Douglas Ferguson <[email protected]> > To: Maven Users List <[email protected]> > Date: 03/04/2010 10:43 PM > >> So I finally got jetty starting from my test case, but it doesn't >> impact the code coverage. >> >> My BasePage class is at 0% which is confusing. >> >> The server is started from the test class which would make you think >> would be using the instrumented classes and jetty would inherit the >> same classpath. >> >> What am I missing? >> >> Douglas >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
