BTW, do you think it is a good idea to use m2eclipse? or other IDE integrate with maven?
Beacuse I found if I work without m2eclipse, each I edit the pom, I should use mvn eclipse:eclipse to update the .classpath ,however the m2eclipse work rather slowly.... :(. How about your? 2010/1/28 Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > I also see that they add other repositories in their pom. A total mess... > > /A > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:05, Stephen Connolly < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Correct, based on their pom.... this is one of those examples of why it > is > > a > > bad plan to add dependencies in a profile that is activated based on the > > build JDK and/or OS > > > > 2010/1/28 maven apache <[email protected]> > > > > > 2010/1/28 Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Here you go: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rampart/rampart-project/1.4/rampart-project-1.4.pom > > > > > > > > I didn't look closely enough. The JDK1.4 profile is active by > default, > > do > > > > as > > > > you're NOT using JDK 1.5 that profile is not going to kick in. > > > > > > > Oh, my fault, I did not check it clearly enouth. > > > You mean not matter which jdk I use( configed in the compile version?), > > as > > > long as the version is not 1.5(for my case , it is 1.6), the jdk14 > > profile > > > will be actived? > > > > > > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:30, maven apache <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2010/1/28 Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > You're building with JDK 1.4, not JDK 1.5. > > > > > > > > > > How? I did not sepcify 1.4 or .1.5. > > > > > In the parent pom of my project I config the compile version to > 1.6, > > > and > > > > my > > > > > eclipse are using jdk1.6_18 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are profiles in the pom of > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.rampart:rampart-policy:jar:1.4 > > > > > > > > > > > > (Actually, the profiles are in the parent of that project). > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I know this, I have check the pom. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The homepage which you refer to isn't telling the complete > truth... > > > > > > > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:15, maven apache < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > I found a strange problem, it seems that maven may download a > > wrong > > > > > > version > > > > > > > for a transitive dependency. > > > > > > > Details can be found here : > > > > > > > http://dpaste.com/151511/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
