Oh, and the link. You can vote here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-578


2009/10/12 Andrey Razumovsky <[email protected]>

> Created a JIRA.
> Actually, since Surefire has only "test" dependency, so it will not be
> anyhow included in a release, so no problems should occur
>
>
> 2009/10/12 Dan Tran <[email protected]>
>
>> yes, I did cut a sureplugin release my self at work, however since you
>> are an apache project, dont think you can release Cayenne with a
>> private copy of surefire.
>>
>> Perhaps you can file a JIRA to release 2.5, i am sure lots of folks
>> will vote for it, that will get attention.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Andrey Razumovsky
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Well, we can if we want to - we have a repository which can be used for
>> such
>> > artifacts. So you advice to make a *local* copy of 2.5-SNAPSHOT and use
>> it
>> > until official 2.5 is released?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > 2009/10/12 Dan Tran <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> since Apache Cayenne cant just fork its own copy of surefire plugin, i
>> >> think releasing 2.5 is badly needed.
>> >>
>> >> -D
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Barrie Treloar <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Andrey Razumovsky
>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> While enchancing our Hudson builds here at Apache Cayenne, we got
>> bitten
>> >> by
>> >> >> SUREFIRE-551. It is now fixed, but doesn't exist in any released
>> >> version.
>> >> >> We've found the snapshot in http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/.
>> So
>> >> our
>> >> >> questions are:
>> >> >> 1. Is 2.5-SNAPSHOT stable enough?
>> >> >> 2. Can we rely on http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/repository in
>> >> our
>> >> >> builds (i.e. aren't there any plans to delete snapshot from that
>> repo)?
>> >> >> 3. When official 2.5 will be released?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Andrey
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > For 1) & 2) NEVER rely on snapshots for your builds.
>> >> >
>> >> > There are a number of problems with using the snapshot repository.
>> >> > 1) You can't select which snapshots to use, it is all or nothing.  So
>> >> > if you aren't following best practice and locking down plugin
>> versions
>> >> > then you will automatically start using snapshot versions when you
>> >> > didnt want to.
>> >> > 2) Snapshots get rebuilt so it may work one day and fail the next.
>> >> >
>> >> > I wrote up the steps I use for this scenario
>> >> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Patching+Maven+Plugins
>> >> >
>> >> > Essentially you take a copy of the source and build a local version
>> of
>> >> > the plugin.
>> >> > If you use a suitable numbering scheme when the official release
>> >> > arrives it will replace your patched version.
>> >> >
>> >> > I can't answer 3) for you.
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andrey
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrey
>



-- 
Andrey

Reply via email to