On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:41, Jason van Zyl wrote: > If you do the following: > > <dependency> > <groupId>foo</groupId> > <artifactId>bar</artifactId> > <type>test</type> > <version>1.0</version> > </dependency> > > You can make the distinction. Currently a type that corresponds to "jar" > and "ejb" will be added to the classpath. So by specifying a type other > than those they will be excluded from the classpath.
I'll correct myself here: the type "test" gets wedged into the "jar" type so even dependencies marked as type "test" will make it into the classpath. Going to take a crack at making a compatible change that will allow test dependencies to actually be separated. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
