If plugins use sourceDirectory instead of src.set, it's a bug.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/



"John D Taylor (ROE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/11/2003 02:53:54 AM:

> I wish I knew - I've been struggling with the same problem.  Many of the
> plugins only seem to process the src directory unfortunately - e.g. 
javadoc
> & checkstyle.
> It's not a very satisfactory solution, but I've created a separate POM 
which
> simply declares my test code to be the source code.  I know it's a bit
> clumsy, but you could factor out the common bits of the two POMs into a 
POM
> which you extend.  This would at least cut down on some of the work in
> maintaining two POMs.
> 
> John Taylor
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Pearcey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:23 AM
> Subject: Creating another checkstyle target
> 
> 
> > How do I create an additional checkstyle target?
> >
> > Currently it does not appear that checkstyle checks any of my test 
code
> > classes, I've pointed this out before but no one seems to care about 
the
> > quality of test code, just that the tests pass. In our projects we 
want to
> > produce all the usual checkstyle reports including coverage of the 
test
> > code, however we suspect that this will want a separate checkstyle
> > configuration as the rules will be slightly less strict.
> >
> > Is this simple to achieve?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Kevin Pearcey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to