> -----Original Message----- > From: Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:18 AM > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: Re: "src/java" or "src/main/java" ? > > > * Vincent Tence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-30 11:26]: > > I second that as well. Good design + proper use of mock objects > > solve almost 100% of the needs for external dependencies on the > > unit tests, whether test files or environment dependencies such as > > the need to have a DB running. Keep in mind that the easiest and > > the fastest it is to run the unit tests, the more you'll run them. > > And it is definitly easier to run a test without external > > dependencies, since you remove the risk of having your test fail > > because of invalid or missing resources. > > > > Of course this only applies to unit tests. Integration tests and > > acceptance tests are another story. > > Sound argument. Are you suggesting then that a distinction be made > between unit, integeration, and acceptence tests in the project > directory structure?
I would love to see the distinction between unit tests, integration tests and acceptance tests built-in in Maven. Unit tests (under src/test) are run everytime I built. Integration and Acceptance (or Customer) tests are not. > > -- > Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
