On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 09:08, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> With ANT 1.6 on the horrizon, it appears that there are some new issues
> to worry about.  For instance, the general impression that Maven is good
> to you if you are good to Maven:
> 
> http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/archives/2003/09/21/index.shtml#000168
> 
> My question comes in this form:  How much difference is there between
> a Maven 1.0 and the next generation Maven that fixes a bunch of the issues
> we already have?
> 
> I mean, will the existing plugins work?  

Yes. The current Maven will essentially be a component of its own. That
is not a problem. How well they will interact with new plugins I'm not
sure yet. But A lot of the standard plugins will more than likely just
be rewritten.

> Is the repository compatible?

Yes, it will be. No plans to change the base structure.

> If so, then I highly recommend the NG Maven sooner than later.  

After 1.0 is released it will be a steam train toward the next version
and will be covered thoroughly in a book Bob and I hope to write. Bob
and I are meeting in Amsterdam this week to go over the outline and we
are going to keep users informed the whole way along which means getting
lots of input on the next version from users.

> If not,
> what can be done to make the plugins compatible?  What work needs to be
> done in that respect?

Essentially the current version of Maven will work as a component.
Really it means making this version an encapsulated bean which I did
work toward and Brett is actually integrating that code. Once 1.0 is out
there will be a deluge of information and the book will be the initial
impetus and I hope the motivation to complete to end where the book
arrives around the release of the next version.

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to