On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 14:14 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 08/31/2012 01:41 PM, NOSpaze wrote: > > But if I use nc and do... > > > > # nc 127.0.0.1 5038 << EOF > > > Action: Login > > > ActionID: 1 > > > Username: youwanna > > > Secret: uwanna > > > > > > EOF > > Asterisk Call Manager/1.0 > > Does the behaviour differ if you type or paste the lines in and then hit > Ctrl-D (or your keybinding for EOF) rather than use a shell here document?
No. Even when I slowly wrote it. > I think this might cause nc to send one big packet with all the lines > which might not be what asterisk expects. I'd also expect telnet to turn > of nagling on the socket (so data is sent immediately rather than > buffering). I think nc doesn't do that although it does provide a > configurable send/receive delay interval (-i). I used big delays. No difference. > Failing that I would try a tethereal/tcpdump to see what's different in > the data going over the wire. Already tried, tcpdump -X. The process is completely different (telnet is interactive, nc don't), and I dont' get which is the precise problem. I've already used nc with asterisk, and worked fine. Maybe is my asterisk version... Thanks! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
