On 02/24/18 12:43, Stephen Morris wrote: > Thanks Ed. Is there any documentation anywhere on what each bit represents?
You mean other than the URL I've supplied at kernel.org and the comments within tainted.c ? > > > With bit 13 being set reflecting the loading of an unsigned module into a > kernel > supporting module signatures, is that because the kernel has been designed for > secure boot, and will turning on secure boot resolve the signing issue? Probably not, since 13 and 12 are probably a pair in your case. > Are all these taint messages, and all the reasons for a taint message being > produced saying that if we have to build our own drivers into the kernel to > be able > to use our hardware, and hence put us into the situation of potentially not > getting > support for kernel defects if any are encountered, that we shouldn't be using > linux? No. It is just saying that in the unlikely event you run into a kernel problem and you want to report it you should first check to see if others have the problem and/or try to reproduce it a non-tainted environment. Like running whatever you thought caused the problem in a QEMU/KVM environment. I don't think it is very likely that you're going to run into a kernel issue that needs reporting. I've never had a kernel crash except years ago when integrating the nVidia drivers was a DYI project. -- A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
