Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on
httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2?
Thanks.
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_cache.so
Use 2.2. There are few good reasons to use 2.0 over 2.2. The upgrade
is very easy. And mod_cache and mod_disk_cache are vastly better in
2.2. mod_mem_cache probably isn't perfectly stable in either version,
and mod_file_cache hasn't changed much since 1.3.
Joshua.
I'm unable to find the RPMs for Fedora or CentOS (which we're using)
that correspond to 2.2.x.
Well, actually, I found a src RPM, which is being compiled with options
I need to customize (possibly via rpmbuild) - I'm from FreeBSD, so RPM
is very new ;-)
It has several dependencies.
Suggestion(s) welcomed.
We already have httpd-2.0 installed on the designated system, which is
why I asked.
I believe our goal is to utilize the mod_mem_cache on the front-end
image servers.
What particular problems have been observed with mod_mem_cache?
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
