Hi Tomas.
Thank you very much for clarification.
The only reason I worry is that the script that I am running is supposed to run 
on the client systems. After the "fix" where I remove old constraints and 
create new ones I run another check to confirm that old settings are gone and 
will not cause any issues after upgrade.
If this check comes back with old values I am issuing a warning that 
configuration "may" need to be updated.
Below is condensed list of commands I use to replace the old with new.
In any case, if pcs constraints list always shows new values I could use it 
instead of cibadmin to verify correct values.
 
pcs constraint colocation remove DBMaster postgres-ms 
pcs constraint colocation remove DBSlave postgres-ms 
pcs constraint colocation add DBMaster with Promoted postgres-ms INFINITY 
id=colocation-  DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted 
pcs constraint colocation add DBSlave with Promoted postgres-ms "-10000" 
id=colocation-     DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted
pcs resource op delete postgres-monitor-interval-5s 
pcs resource op add postgres monitor interval=5s timeout=300s on-fail=restart 
role=Promoted 

Thank you very much for your help!
_Vitaly

> On 04/10/2025 5:17 AM EDT Tomas Jelinek <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> Hi Vitaly,
> 
> You don't need to worry much about this.
> 
> When pcs is editing CIB, it prefers using the new role names and 
> automatically falls back to the old role names based on pacemaker / CIB 
> schema version. When pcs is printing the configuration, it does a reverse 
> transformation and prints the new role names even if CIB contains the old 
> ones.
> 
> Pacemaker 2.1, which pcs 0.11 is compatible with, is capable of handling both 
> old and new role names.
> 
> If you want to get rid of the old role names, you may replace them in CIB 
> ('pcs cluster edit') or drop the constraints and recreate them using pcs. If 
> it fails, you maybe have an old CIB version. You can update that with 'pcs 
> cluster cib-upgrade'.
> 
> Regards,
> Tomas
> 
>  
> 
> Dne 09. 04. 25 v 20:35 vitaly napsal(a):
> 
> > Hello,
> > I have dual node clusters with postgres as one of the resources.
> > The clusters were upgraded from pcs v 0.10 to pcs v 0.11.
> > Pcs V 0.11 eliminated Master role and replaced it with Promoted.
> > For clusters that were upgraded I needed to remove old configuration for 
> > colocation because with old one in place while creating new one commit of 
> > the configuration was failing due to duplicate constraint.
> > Update works fine on all the clusters but on one of them AFTER UPGRADE I 
> > see different output in “cibadmin --query” and in “pcs constraint list”
> >  
> > The constraints in “cibadmin –query” are showing:
> > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBSlave" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="-10000" 
> > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Master" 
> > id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> >  
> > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBMaster" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="INFINITY" 
> > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Master" 
> > id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> >  
> > Same constraints in “pcs constraint list” were showing:
> > Colocation Constraints:
> > Started resource 'DBSlave' with Promoted resource 'postgres-ms' score=-10000
> >  
> > Started resource 'DBMaster' with Promoted resource 'postgres-ms' 
> > score=INFINITY
> >  
> > On all other systems “cibadmin –query” is in agreement with pcs and shows:
> > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBSlave" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="-10000" 
> > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Promoted" 
> > id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> >  
> > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBMaster" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="INFINITY" 
> > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Promoted" 
> > id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> >  
> > So my problem is in with-rsc-role showing “Master” on a single system and 
> > “Promoted” on all others.
> >  
> > Would appreciate it if anybody could shed some light on the issue.
> > Thank you very much!
> > _Vitaly
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Manage your subscription:
> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> 
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

Reply via email to