Thanks! Guess I should have read the manual! I spent today learning what options there are and sure I can get it to behave. ________________________________ From: Users <[email protected]> on behalf of Kevin P. Fleming <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 3:42 PM To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync over dedicated interface?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:37 AM Dave Withheld <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is it possible to get corosync to use the private network and stop trying to > use the LAN for cluster communications? Or am I totally off-base and am > missing something in my drbd/pacemaker configuration? Absolutely! When I setup my two-node cluster recently I did exactly that. If you are using 'pcs' to manage your cluster, ensure that you add the 'addr=' parameter during 'pcs host auth' so that Corosync and the layers above it will use that address for the host. Something like: $ pcs host auth cluster-node-1 addr=192.168.10.1 cluster-node-2 addr=192.168.10.2 In this mode the node's name is never 'looked up' to find an IP address, the IP address is stored in the configuration. _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
