On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 3:59 PM Ulrich Windl < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi! > > I have a proposal (request) for enhancing sbd: > (I'm not suggesting a complete rewrite with reasonable options, as I had > don that before already ;-)) > When configuring an additional disk device, it would be quite handy to be > able to "clone" the configuration from an existing device. > what you're suggesting is instead of entering the parameters for creation of a device you would like to have the possibility to instead point to an existing configured device? sounds like a good idea. > As I understand it, sbd uses the physical block size for disk layout, so a > simple dd won't do the job when old and new device use different physical > block sizes, right? > yep - physical block size is queried and used for message-box entries - for good reason Klaus > I think manually entering the parameters for the sbd header (the way it > has to be done now) is quite error-prone, and it's easy to configure > devices using different timing parameters. > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
