>>> Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.08.2022 um 20:26 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: ... > It is almost always wrong to have multiple independent pacemaker > resources managing the same underlying physical resource.
It's not the cluster bible that says: "No man can have two masters" ;-) But it applies to clusters quite nicely. > > It looks like you attempt to reimplement high available NFS server on > client side. If you insist on this, I see as the only solution separate > resource agent that monitors state of export/data resources and sets > attribute accordingly. But effectively you will be duplicating pacemaker > logic. I never did it, but didn't allow NFS to provide multiple sources, thus specifying redundancy (maybe never in Linux)? The only thing is: It was designed for read-only servers as data consistency is quite a challenge then. > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
