On 08.10.2021 10:24, martin doc wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, the suggestion to use a rule helped some. I had tried that but what I 
> got wrong is that the name for the score stored by ping is not ping but pingd 
> (yay backwards compat.) Thanks Ken for the pointer and getting me to go back 
> to that.
> 
> Now I'm stuck with the problem of getting resources to rebalance when all of 
> the clones are available. If I arbitrarily set the node utilization of cpu to 
> 8 and memory to 10000 and then assign cpu=5 and memory=5000 to each resource, 
> it does not rebalance once all of the pingd resources have a value > 0. A 
> "crm_simulate" shows one node with 10 cpu & 10000 memory free, one with 0 
> cpu/memory free and one half used. The utilization will prevent over 
> allocation but doesn't balance out resources.
> 

What is the value of placement-strategy cluster property?

> A change in the state of pingd's value does cause the policy engine to do 
> something but it just decides to keep all of the resources where they are.
> 
> I don't know anything about pcs colors.
> 
> I will keep trying variations.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> 

_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

Reply via email to