On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Antony Stone <[email protected]> schrieb am 06.08.2021 um > 14:41 in > Nachricht <[email protected]>: > ... > > location pref_A GroupA rule ‑inf: site ne cityA > > location pref_B GroupB rule ‑inf: site ne cityB > > I'm wondering whether the first is equivalentto > location pref_A GroupA rule inf: site eq cityA >
No, it is not. The original constraint prohibits running resources anywhere except cityA even if cityA is not available; your version allows it if cityA is not available. _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
