>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <[email protected]> schrieb am 07.04.2020 um >>> 23:02 in Nachricht <20140_1586293370_5E8CEA7A_20140_452_1_20200407230230.1bc9b7b0@firost>: > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:13:35 -0400 > Sherrard Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
[...] > But the best protection is to disable pacemaker on boot so an admin can > investigate the situation and join back the node safely. Actually before pacemaker we had a two-node cluster running without problems. Maybe pacemaker should fix two-node mode. Requiring manual intervention should be an absolute exception; instead the fenced node should integrate to the existing cluster, or form a new cluster. Both correctly, of course... > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
