>>> Ken Gaillot <[email protected]> schrieb am 05.11.2019 um 16:05 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > Coincidentally, the documentation for the pcmk_host_check default was > recently updated for the upcoming 2.0.3 release. Once the release is > out, the online documentation will be regenerated, but here is the > text: > > Default > ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ > static‑list if either pcmk_host_list or pcmk_host_map is set, otherwise > dynamic‑list if the fence device supports the list action, otherwise > status if the fence device supports the status action, otherwise none
I'd make that an itemized list with four items. I thinks it would be easer to understand. > > On Tue, 2019‑11‑05 at 11:01 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> Roger Zhou <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On 11/3/19 12:56 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> > >> > > Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> writes: >> > > >> > > > According to documentation, pcmk_host_list is used only if >> > > > pcmk_host_check=static‑list which is not default, by default >> > > > pacemaker >> > > > queries agent for nodes it can fence and fence_scsi does not >> > > > return >> > > > anything. >> > > >> > > The documentation is somewhat vague here. The note about >> > > pcmk_host_list >> > > says: "optional unless pcmk_host_check is static‑list". It does >> > > not >> > > state how pcmk_host_list is used if pcmk_host_check is the >> > > default >> > > dynamic‑list, >> > >> > The confusion might be because of "the language barrier". >> > >> > My interpretation is like this: >> > >> > 1. pcmk_host_list is used only if pcmk_host_check is static‑list. >> > >> > 2. pcmk_host_check's default is dynamic‑list. >> > That means, by default pcmk_host_list is not used at all. >> >> But this interpretation does not align with reality: >> >> > > but I successfully use such setups with Pacemaker 1.1.16 >> > > with fence_ipmilan. >> >> (I mean I don't set pcmk_host_check on my fence_ipmilan resources, >> only >> pcmk_host_list, and they work.) >> >> Unless: >> >> > > the behavior is different in 2.0.1 (the version in Debian >> > > buster). >> >> That's why I asked: >> >> > > Ram, what happens if you set pcmk_host_check to static‑list? >> >> Of course the developers are most welcome to chime in with their >> intentions and changes concerning this, I haven't got the time to dig >> into the core right now. Tough I'm very much interested for my own >> sake >> as well, because I'm about to bring up a buster cluster with very >> similar config. > ‑‑ > Ken Gaillot <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
