On 2019-10-16 2:16 a.m., Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>> "Lentes, Bernd" <[email protected]> schrieb am 15.10.2019 > um > 21:35 in Nachricht > <1922568650.3402980.1571168140600.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>: >> Hi, >> >> i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS). >> Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2 managed by pacemaker. >> They all are fundamental prerequisites for my resources (Virtual Domains). >> To configure them i used clones and groups. >> Why not having them managed by systemd to make the cluster setup more >> overseeable ? >> >> Is there a strong reason that pacemaker cares about them ? > > AFAIK, DLM (others maybe too) need the cluster infrastructure (comminication > layer) to be operable. > Also I consider systemd handling resources being worse than pacemaker. > What is your specific problem? Keeping the cluster configuration simple while > moving complexity to systemd? > > Do you know one command to describe your systemd configuration as short as the > cluster configuration (like crm configuration show)? > > Regards, > Ulrich
This is correct. DLM uses corosync. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/ "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." - Stephen Jay Gould _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
