For the question one, I don't think start-failure-is-fatal is good way for me. It barely has no interval for retrying and easily leads to flooding log output in a short time.
T. Ladd Omar <[email protected]> 于2018年10月23日周二 下午9:06写道： > Hi all, I send this message to get some answers for my questions about > Pacemaker. > 1. In order to cleanup start-failed resources automatically, I add > failure-timeout attribute for resources, however, the common way to trigger > the recovery is by cluster-recheck whose interval is 15min by default. I > wonder how lower value could I set for the cluster-recheck-interval. I had > to let the failed resources recover somewhat quickly while little impact > taken by the more frequent cluster-recheck. > Or, is there another way to automatically cleanup start-failed resources ? > 2. Is Pacemaker suitable for the Master-Slave model HA ? I had some > productive problems when I use Pacemaker. If only one resource stopped on > one node, should I failover all this node for the whole cluster? If not, > the transactions from the ports on this node may fail for this failure. If > yes, it seems to be big action for just one resource failure. >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
