>>> Ken Gaillot <[email protected]> schrieb am 20.08.2018 um 17:11 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 2018‑08‑16 at 12:50 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have a question, specifically whether this behavior changed not too >> long ago: >> AFAIR, stickyness only affected running resources, i.e. during >> restart a new (=lightly loaded) node was selected for the resource. >> However when I restarted a resource today (SLES11 SP4), the resource >> was started on a busy node, even one node had no resources at all >> after being restarted earlier. >> >> The docs are not very precise on that. >> >> Regards, >> Ulrich > > It appears stickiness still applies if the stop and start are scheduled > in the same transition (e.g. failure recovery). That makes sense > because the actions are scheduled based on the state of the resource at > the start of the transition (active). There haven't been any > intentional changes in stickiness behavior in many years. I haven't > tested the behavior with older versions to see if it's different > though.
Hi! Thanks for that. Interestingly I restarted another resource that is configured just like the other one, and that resource was placed to the empty node. So if it works sometimes, and sometimes not, I suspect it's a bug ;-) Actually I have an open support call for this, but still without results. Regards, Ulrich > ‑‑ > Ken Gaillot <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
