Hello all: we have implemented large cluster solutions for complex server environments that had databases, application servers, apache web servers and implemented fencing with the IPMI fencing agent.
However, we are considering if pacemaker would be a good solution for high availability for an embedded control system that integrates with CAN for vehicles? We will also have Ethernet for cluster communication between the hardware units. My main questions are: 1) Is it common use case to use pacemaker to implement high availability for embedded control systems? 2) What, if any, special considerations should be taken when it comes to fencing in this type of environment? Thank you for any guidance! -- Kindest Regards, Chad Cravens (800) 214-9146 x700 [image: http://www.ossys.com] <http://www.ossys.com> [image: http://www.linkedin.com/company/open-source-systems-llc] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/open-source-systems-llc> [image: https://www.facebook.com/OpenSrcSys] <https://www.facebook.com/OpenSrcSys> [image: https://twitter.com/OpenSrcSys] <https://twitter.com/OpenSrcSys> [image: http://www.youtube.com/OpenSrcSys] <http://www.youtube.com/OpenSrcSys> [image: http://www.ossys.com/feed] <http://www.ossys.com/feed> [image: [email protected]] <[email protected]> Chad Cravens (800) 214-9146 x700 [email protected] http://www.ossys.com
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
