Alexander Markov <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, Kristoffer > >> Did you test failover through pacemaker itself? > > Yes, I did, no problems here. > >> However: Am I understanding it correctly that you have one node in each >> data center, and a stonith device in each data center? > > Yes. > >> If the >> data center is lost, the stonith device for the node in that data >> center >> would also be lost and thus not able to fence. > > Exactly what happens! > >> In such a hardware configuration, only a poison pill solution like SBD >> could work, I think. > > I've got no shared storage here. Every datacenter has its own storage > and they have replication on top (similar to drbd). I can organize a > cross-shared solution though if it help, but don't see how.
The only solution I know which allows for a configuration like this is using separate clusters in each data center, and using booth for transferring ticket ownership between them. Booth requires a data center-level quorum (meaning at least 3 locations), though the third location can be just a small daemon without an actual cluster, and can run in a public cloud or similar for example. Cheers, Kristoffer > >> -- >> Regards, >> Alexander > > -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // [email protected] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
