I know, when AM making container request, if the request container is NODE_LOCAL, then AM will also send out RACK_LOCAL and OFF_SWITCH requests. On the ResourceManager side, if RM successfully assigned a NODE_LOCAL container, I saw that RM canceled RACK_LOCAL and OFF_SWITCH requests because it was a duplicated request and did not need to be allocated any more. However, my problem is that if the *allowRelaxity* for RACK_LOCAL and OFF_SWITCH is true, NODE_LOCAL request is downgraded to RACK_LOCAL , thus NODE_LOCAL's request is allocated with RACK_LOCAL locality, then OFF_SWITCH's duplicated request will be canceled of course, however I did not see RM cancel the duplicated NODE_LOCAL request, so, won't it lead to NODE_LOCAL request still exist and then be scheduled in the next-round scheduling?
