iif you dont mind the task running as daemon
you can setup a list of daemons in daemons nested element in the parallel task
http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/parallel.html

similar to exec with spawn
http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/exec.html

Martin Gainty 
______________________________________________ 
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
 
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger 
sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung 
oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem 
Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. 
Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung 
fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez 
l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est 
interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe 
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement 
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité 
pour le contenu fourni.


> From: abr...@awrcorp.com
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ant exec task message priority
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:34:58 +0000
> 
> The only change is the ant version used. I've already determined this.
> 
> All my build xml files are under version control. The only change was using 
> 1.8.2 instead of 1.7.0 in a cruisecontrol config file for where it looks for 
> the ant binaries to use. I have both the 1.7 and 1.8.2 ant binaries in my 
> repo so I can switch back and forth easily.
> 
> I haven't looked at the ant 1.7 docs compared to the ant 1.8 docs so I'll 
> check that out.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adam
> 
> Adam Bruss
> Senior Development Engineer
> AWR Corporation
> 11520 N. Port Washington Rd., Suite 201
> Mequon, WI  53092  USA
> P: 1.262.240.0291 x104
> F: 1.262.240.0294
> E: abr...@awrcorp.com
> W: http://www.awrcorp.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Echlin, Robert [mailto:robert.ech...@windriver.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:28 AM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: RE: ant exec task message priority
> 
> Hi Adam,
> I'm not familiar with any such change in Ant. Which doesn't mean there is 
> none. :-)
> 
> Is there a change in the build.xml file?
> Or can you run with the two versions of ant on the same file and get the 
> differences you mention?
> 
> Have you looked at the 1.7 and 1.8.2  Ant docs for the ant exec task to see 
> if they show differences of this nature?
> 
> Rob
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Bruss [mailto:abr...@awrcorp.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 3:42 PM
> > To: user@ant.apache.org
> > Subject: ant exec task message priority
> > 
> > We run make with the ant exec task
> > 
> > ant 1.7.0 would naturally classify messages from make with priorities of 
> > info,
> > warning or error.
> > 
> > ant 1.8.2 classifies all messages from make as priority info!
> > 
> > This causes our cruisecontrol emails to contain no messages from the make
> > build.
> > 
> > Why does ant 1.8.2 not classify messages from exec logs anymore and how
> > can it be fixed?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Adam
> > 
> > Adam Bruss
> > Senior Development Engineer
> > AWR Corporation
> > 11520 N. Port Washington Rd., Suite 201
> > Mequon, WI  53092  USA
> > P: 1.262.240.0291 x104
> > F: 1.262.240.0294
> > E: abr...@awrcorp.com
> > W: http://www.awrcorp.com<http://www.awrcorp.com/>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
> 
                                          

Reply via email to