Hi Andrew, Thank you for that :-)
-=david=- On 27 October 2010 12:46, Andrew Thorburn <nzi...@gmail.com> wrote: > You could use overrides to explicitly set the version (probably to > 1.1). See > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/ivyfile/override.html > for more on that. > > - Andrew > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:38 PM, David Harrigan <dharri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, what do I do if the module is a 3rd party lib that hasn't defined >> the version? As a workaround, I've done this: >> >> <exclude org="activation" name="activation"/> >> >> Since, somewhere else, an attempt is made by another 3rd party module >> to pull in "javax.activation/activation" which is cool. >> >> Is the only think I can do is use the workaround? >> >> -=david=- >> >> On 27 October 2010 10:34, Maarten Coene <maarten_co...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> My guess is that it this module didn't define which version of activition is >>> needed. >>> If the revision isn't defined, ivy will default the revision to something >>> like >>> "work...@local-hostname". >>> >>> Maarten >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: David Harrigan <dharri...@gmail.com> >>> To: ivy-u...@ant.apache.org >>> Sent: Wed, October 27, 2010 10:59:40 AM >>> Subject: Strange IvyDE issue >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm having an issue with the latest version of IvyDE >>> (2.1.0.201008101807-RELEASE) in Eclipse. A module is attempting to >>> pull in activation, yet, I keep on getting this error: >>> >>> Some projects fail to be resolved >>> Impossible to resolve dependencies of fu#bar;0.1.0-SNAPSHOT >>> unresolved dependency: activation#activation;work...@pc-738: not found >>> >>> You can see that it's attempting to use my local machine, plus what is >>> this "working" attribute? >>> >>> It's causing the resolve to fail. >>> >>> Any ideas anyone? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> -=david=- >>> >>> -- >>> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9 >>> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9 >>> >>> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the >>> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design >>> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9 >> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9 >> >> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the >> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design >> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan. >> > -- I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9 Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9 "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
