No, that's just a wrapper task that executes the subtasks it wraps in order. It is not "thread-safe", which is what I am looking for.
Basically, what I'm looking for is a locking mechanism for certain tasks that can't run in parallel. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:24 PM To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: Atomic/Synchronized Task On Jun 24, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Perrier, Nathan wrote: > Hello all, > > > > I was curious if there exists a means to atomically execute tasks when > running targets in parallel. > <sequential> ? -Matt > > > I.E., I would like to do something like the following: > > > > <target name="begin"> > > <parallel> > > <antcall target="one"/> > > <antcall target="two"/> > > </parallel> > > </target> > > > > <target name="one"> > > ... > > Do something in parallel > > ... > > <synchronized> > > ... > > Do something atomically > > ... > > </synchronized> > > ... > > </target> > > > > <target name="two"> > > ... > > Do something in parallel > > ... > > <synchronized> > > ... > > Do something atomically > > ... > > </synchronized> > > ... > > </target> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
