On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 01:28:42PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I see a qemu-system-xtensa so might give that a try too. > > Please do. I'd be happy to answer any questions. > I also hope to port musl to xtensa this year.
Would you like to be involved in binfmt/toolchain discussions going on now? My plan for nommu support with musl is to start with plain ELF, ET_DYN (PIE) form only, with both static and dynamic linking supported. This gives behavior identical to MMU-ful archs, but of course with no text sharing. Then we can add FDPIC as needed to get shared text; this requires both toolchain support and library/dynamic linker runtime changes in musl. With musl being something of a clean slate and aiming for minimal arch-specific code, I really don't want to carry forward legacy binfmts and associated support code, but I do want to understand if there are any particular properties of existing binfmts/ABIs/etc. that are important to developers/users, and I'd like to hear if you have any input on this from the Xtensa side. Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
