On 2011-11-27, Philip Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Grant Edwards ><[email protected]> wrote: >> We asked that the "noreturn" attribute be removed from abort() so that >> core files contain sufficient info for getting a bactrace... > > Why does uclibc need it removed, but glibc doesn't?
Glibc does need to have it removed. This has been a known problem with glibc for years. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00060.html I think it's a problem with glibc on i386 as well. I don't know if it it is also a problem in uClibc on i386. -- Grant _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
